faqsilikon.blogg.se

1. #Sublime album covers 2560 x 1440 drivers#
2. #Sublime album covers 2560 x 1440 driver#
3. #Sublime album covers 2560 x 1440 software#

Sublime Text Build ~ $ lspci | grep VGAĠ1:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870 2.40GHzįlags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes lahf_lm epb tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid dtherm ida aratĪddress sizes : 44 bits physical, 48 bits virtual OpenGL version string: 4.5.0 NVIDIA 367.57 OpenGL renderer string: GeForce GTX 1080/PCIe/SSE2 Server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation

#Sublime album covers 2560 x 1440 drivers#

I realize that some of you have provided this information before, but some are missing some bits, there have been changes in ST3, and it sounds like some drivers have improved.ĬORE SPECS: DL580 G7 / 4 x E7-4870 / 512GB DDR3ĭual Monitor setup with two Xorg servers running with native driver.ġ1:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP104 (rev a1) To get to a clean state, follow the directions at, just ensure you move your config folder so you can restore it afterwards.

#Sublime album covers 2560 x 1440 driver#

If memory bandwidth or allocation was an issue, it should have been alleviated with the rendering improvements.īecause of those facts, and the fact that the issue only seems to affect some Linux users, and some users have noticed a difference with different drivers, I think collecting information about the machines affected may help in the process of seeing if there is a solution.įor those seeing the issue, could you try build 3111 in a clean state (no third-party packages), and then post:

If you are not seeing a difference with 3110 or 3111, then likely the performance issue is related to copying the offscreen buffers to the screen. The changes in 3110 have to do with optimizing the composition of the interface on the off screen buffers.

If my hunch on Skia above is correct, I'd guess that you'll be seeing the same performance issue in ST2. tar.gz download, load up the same files and report back whether the performance is significantly better, same or worse. Just a thought.Ĭan you see if you experience the same issue in ST2? Try installing into a subfolder of your home using the. If this option is handled by Skia, there may be some hope if Jon can add a setting to enable this in ST3 as well.

#Sublime album covers 2560 x 1440 software#

since Chrome also uses Skia and you had to set "override software rendering list", that suggests that Skia may have a blacklist of platform drivers/gpus for which it kicks down to software rendering, as you suggested. Skia uses hardware acceleration where available, but that doesn't mean that there isn't room for improvement in the way Sublime utilises it. ST2 used software rendering exclusively, but I'm not sure about ST3 there have been "significant improvements" to rendering in ST3 generally but we don't have much in the way of specific info.Įdit: ST3's rendering used Cairo originally and moved over to Skia at build 3034.